Russia and Eurasia

Azerbaijan: No Jitters Over Turkmenistan’s Caspian Sea Threat


Shahin Abbasov


Turkmenistan’s pledge to take Azerbaijan to court over the two countries’ rival claims to Caspian Sea oil fields has sparked more confusion than anger in Baku. Some Azerbaijani experts even believe that an international arbitration hearing could prove the best way to resolve a long-standing energy dispute.


At a special July 24 government meeting in Ashgabat, Turkmen President Gurbanguly Berdymukhamedov ordered Foreign Minister Rashid Meredov to have lawyers investigate the legitimacy of Azerbaijan’s claims to the Omar, Osman and Serdar fields. These fields are known as Azeri, Chirag and Kapaz in Baku. Berdymukhamedov also expressed a desire to probe the legality of foreign energy companies’ participation in the fields’ development. Berdymukhamedov called for the lawyers’ findings to be sent to an unspecified international arbitration court, according to the Turkmen state-owned TDH news agency.


The fact that a BP-led consortium has already begun development work in the Omar/Azeri and Osman/Chirag fields under a 1994 agreement with Azerbaijan suggests that Baku holds a “one-sided” approach to the issue, Berdymukhamedov said. “Such one-sided work practices in the Caspian are unacceptable for Turkmenistan.”


The fields, together with the Azerbaijani-owned Guneshli, hold an estimated 620 million tons of oil reserves. Serdar/Kapaz holds about 50 million tons.

Turkmenistan’s announcement took Baku by surprise. The Turkmen government had made no statement about disagreements with Azerbaijan after July 15-17 bilateral talks in Baku that focused on resolving the Caspian Sea’s legal status. And on July 9, State Oil Company of the Azerbaijani Republic (SOCAR) President Rovnag Abdullayev visited Ashgabat, where Berdymukhamedov emphasized “Turkmenistan’s commitment to develop[ing] friendly relations with neighboring Azerbaijan.”

Azerbaijani officials have taken the Turkmen announcement in stride. Deputy Foreign Minister Khalaf Khalafov, who is responsible for the Caspian Sea negotiations, told ANS TV on July 27 that Azerbaijan will defend its interests in the development of Caspian oil fields by all possible means. “As early as the early 1990s, Azerbaijan conducted detailed research concerning these fields and our position now is fully legal,” Khalafov said.

Baku energy and political experts are at a loss to explain the timing of the Turkmen move. One analyst said it was “strange” that Berdymukhamedov decided to pick a legal fight with Baku at a time when both states have been exploring cooperation on large-scale energy projects, including potential participation in the Nabucco pipeline.

Another political analyst in Baku suggested that Azerbaijani officials could turn the Turkmen leader’s announcement to their own advantage. Seeking arbitration “is better that than endlessly keeping the problem unresolved, poisoning bilateral relations, blocking cooperation and letting third countries play off the existing hostility [between Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan on this question],” said political analyst Rasim Musabekov.

“If there is no way to solve it by bilateral talks and Ashgabat wants to appeal to international arbitration, I see no reason why Baku should be against that,” he added.

Another analyst believes the Turkmen announcement provides Azerbaijan with a potential pretext to scuttle the development of a pipeline network — including both Nabucco and a trans-Caspian pipeline — that would circumvent Russian control. Baku has long been a supporter of the US- and European Union-backed alternate delivery path, but in recent months Azerbaijan has started to send out contradictory signals about its commitment to Nabucco and other Western-backed projects.

While Azerbaijan remains involved in the development of Nabucco, Baku’s energy relationship with Moscow has intensified of late, a fact underscored by Azerbaijan’s deal with Gazprom concerning natural gas supplies from Stage 2 of the Shah Deniz gas field project. Some experts believe that Azerbaijani officials are calculating that an expansion in energy cooperation with Russia will pay off via increased Kremlin support for Baku’s stance in the Nagorno-Karabakh peace process.

At the same time Moscow-Baku energy ties have been developing, the relationship between Russia and Turkmenistan has been rapidly deteriorating. Ashgabat has recently reduced its supply contract with Gazprom and signed a contract for exploration and development of its Caspian Sea gas reserves with RWE, a German entity that is a member of the Western-backed Nabucco pipeline consortium. Nabucco in mid-July took a significant step forward with the signing of an intergovernmental agreement on transit arrangements. While Turkmenistan did not sign the Nabucco transit deal, it is regularly touted as a potential supplier for the pipeline.

To block the possibility Turkmen participation in Nabucco, Moscow may try to use Baku, political analyst Ilgar Mammadov said.

“Turkmenistan’s move is probably the last chance for Russia,” Mammadov suggested, referring to Moscow’s desire to block the construction of a pipeline network that the Kremlin can’t control. “If Moscow wants Azerbaijan to block the Trans-Caspian and Nabucco pipelines, it has to respond positively to Baku’s efforts for a resolution of the Karabakh conflict [with Armenia].”

Without that incentive, Mammadov continued, Baku would be disinclined to do Russia’s bidding. Instead, Baku would be content to seek an arrangement that would settle Turkmenistan’s claims and allow the Nabucco and trans-Caspian pipeline projects to proceed. [Editor’s Note: Ilgar Mammadov is a board member of the Open Society Assistance Foundation — Azerbaijan, which is affiliated with the Open Society Institute (OSI) in New York. operates under OSI’s auspices].

If it comes to arbitration, many experts in Baku believe Azerbaijan would prevail. Turkmenistan’s claims to the fields “are groundless,” argued Rustam Mammadov, a law professor at Baku State University and an expert on Caspian Sea legal issues. “Azerbaijan enjoyed the right to these fields under the USSR, and, in the case of the Caspian Sea, the standard legal principle applies: The owner is [that country] which owned it before,” Mammadov said.

That position, though, may be a matter of perspective. Berdymukhamedov claims to be in possession of Soviet-era documents that clearly define all the disputed fields as being located in the Caspian Sea’s Turkmen sector.

Copyright (c) 2003 Open Society Institute. Reprinted with the permission of the Open Society Institute, 400 West 59th Street, New York, NY 10019 USA, or

About the author / 


Leave a reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

jga bookreview


jga bookreview

jga bookreview

jga bookreview

jga bookreview

jga bookreview

jga bookreview

jga bookreview


  • The inherent dangers of secrecy in the US foreign policy

    Since the Vietnam War, officials of the United States have increasingly abused the essential democratic safeguards of accountability and an informed citizenry in apparent attempts to protect themselves from being held accountable for their actions. They use secrecy and disinformation to prevent the American people from obtaining the information they need to evaluate their government’s…

  • 18th Issue of Political Reflection Magazine is Out Now!

    Vol. V | No. I – January-February-March 2019 To Download the Magazine Click Here… CONTENTS 05-06…..World News by Furkan Sahin 09-14…..The Ideological Potential of Climate Change: (Post) Politics in the Age of Global Warming by Miguel Angel Zhan Dai 15-18…..Yemen Civil War: A Conflict That Has Never Ended by Dr. I. Aytac Kadioglu 21-25…..NATO: The Shifting Sands of an Alliance by…

  • CESRAN International Named again amongst the Top Think Tanks in the World

    CESRAN International is pleased to announce that it has been named again amongst the world’s best think tanks. The 2018 Global Go To Think Tank Index ranked CESRAN International 141st among the World’s “Top Think Tanks in Western Europe” 76th among the World’s “Top Environment Policy Think Tanks” 152nd among the World’s “Top Foreign Policy…

  • New Issue is Out Now!

    Vol. IV | No. V – October-November-December 2018 To Download the Magazine Click Here… CONTENTS 04-06…..World News by Furkan Sahin  08-20…..Terrorism in Syria and Beyond: An Interview with Prof. Alain Gabon by Dr. Rahman Dag 22-24…..Erdogan’s Best Shot is Still in the West by Dr. Murat Ulgul 26-30…..Raqqa vs Kobani – Terrorism vs Revolution by Dr. Rahman Dag 32-34…..Future of…

  • Domestic Politics and the Design of International Institutions

    Abstract Scholars are increasing focused on how and why states design international institutions. International relations theories have historically guided research on these institutions, but have not provided adequate insights into the theoretical bases for their design. Rationalists’ theories of domestic politics offer an alternative approach to understanding institutional design. This study utilizes the positive theory…