Americas Programme


The study of politics of the Americas requires a redefinition of how one defines what region, regionness, and regional area studies mean. By region, we are not speaking of clear, objective, and preconceived geographical divisions; rather, regions are historically constructed and contested spaces of imaginations in which power relations, economic dynamics, and material conditions shape the perception of what constitutes a region. Equally, the static conception of region precludes the novel interconnections among, between, and within the regions, which are by-products of the sustained interactions between structures, actors, institutions, processes, and the nexus between the global, regional, national, and local spaces. If we adopt this eclectic view of regions, knowing what the Americas mean becomes a problematique on its own.

The American Studies Research Area strives for diverse ontological, epistemological, and methodological positions as regards approaching the politics of the Americas. Whilst we there are many ways in studying political and economic change in Latin America, three main assumptions can be established as a point of departure. Firstly, we emphasise interconnectedness that links regions, states, institutions, and actors across the North and South Hemisphere. Amongst many things, this implies the recognition of the impact of changes that is happening in one part of the continent towards the other parts of the region. Migration, cross-border trade, and regional integration are some of the themes that immediately require such emphasis on interconnectedness. More crucially, globalisation studies is the study of the changes in economic, political and social relations within a spatial context that puts Latin American politics within the globalised context. Without losing analytical focus, any attempt to understand change in the region must take into account what is novel about this specific historical conjuncture of the globalisation of markets. Secondly, history and context matter. Whilst we do not advocate for an excessively historical approach to theory-building, research that makes sense to the general public is one that reflects on the consequences of the past to the present and future choices, processes, and institutions. That Latin American countries undertook dramatic policy changes and made their commitments towards marketisation cannot ignore the overwhelming failure of state-led development projects to structure state-society relations. Equally, we cannot ignore the costs associated with neoliberalism, and its embeddedness in state-market-society complexes, such that attempts towards a post-neoliberal phase of development are historically contextual processes that are constrained by the external environment. Political choices and socio-economic structures are by-products of decades of change that have reinforced and challenged state autonomy and societal discretion as regards the developmental trajectory of Latin American countries. Finally, since we live in a globalised world, no social or political action can be isolated from the international context. If we want to understand why radical institutional change has not been viable for some countries as policy options, then we need to examine the configuration of power, which inevitably brings in the global and transnational dimensions in political analysis. All these three key points remind us that Latin America, more than any other region in the world, has been integrated in the global system of states and markets. Therefore, the region’s historical role to political economy and international relations cannot be ignored.

Taking all these into accounts, we aim to assemble scholarly pieces that are not only policy relevant but also critically reflective of the ideas and policies that are being debated in contemporary Latin American societies. We also want to highlight the role of the region in global debates on international development, actual practices of inter-state relations, and in critical thought as regards ideas of politics, economics, and society.

CESRAN welcomes your contribution in building knowledge and expertise in relation to the analysis of contemporary politics in this important developing region of the world.

Sincerely yours…

About the author / 


Leave a reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

jga bookreview

jga bookreview


jga bookreview

jga bookreview

jga bookreview

jga bookreview

jga bookreview

jga bookreview

jga bookreview


  • New Issue is Out Now!

    Vol. IV | No. V – October-November-December 2018 To Download the Magazine Click Here… CONTENTS 04-06…..World News by Furkan Sahin  08-20…..Terrorism in Syria and Beyond: An Interview with Prof. Alain Gabon by Dr. Rahman Dag 22-24…..Erdogan’s Best Shot is Still in the West by Dr. Murat Ulgul 26-30…..Raqqa vs Kobani – Terrorism vs Revolution by Dr. Rahman Dag 32-34…..Future of…

  • Domestic Politics and the Design of International Institutions

    Abstract Scholars are increasing focused on how and why states design international institutions. International relations theories have historically guided research on these institutions, but have not provided adequate insights into the theoretical bases for their design. Rationalists’ theories of domestic politics offer an alternative approach to understanding institutional design. This study utilizes the positive theory…

  • Five generations after the Balfour Declaration: How do Palestinians Resist and Engender Significant Social Change?

    How to Cite: SELLICK, P. (2018), Five generations after the Balfour Declaration: How do Palestinians Resist and Engender Significant Social Change?. Journal of Conlicft Transformation and Security, 6(2): 139–142. The context of Israeli expansion and Palestinian dispossession Over the past year, a series of anniversaries has occurred which marks the progressive dispossession and displacement of the Palestinians….

  • CESRAN International named the World’s #83 “Best Independent Think Tank”

    CESRAN International is pleased to announce that it has been named the world’s number 83 “Best Independent Think Tank”. The ranking was announced in the 2017 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report compiled by the University of Pennsylvania’s Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) at the Lauder Institute. CESRAN International was also ranked 77th among the “Top Environment…

  • The Current State of AI as We Begin 2018

    Artificial intelligence (AI) states one recent article is no smarter than a six-year-old. A study that appeared last summer compared the intelligence quotient (IQ) of Google, Apple, Baidu, and Bing AI to the average human 18, 12, and 6-year-olds. The 6-year-old’s IQ was rated at 55.5 while the 12 and 18-year-olds rated 84.5 and 97.0 respectively. The end result rated…