Russia and Eurasia

Has Armenia Changed?

0 17

By Zaur Shiriyev | 22 April 2010


The word “change” has recently become rather popular in political campaigns, starting of course with that of U.S. President Barack Obama, who perhaps led a sort of a political rebirth of the word. It’s a word used in the political context, as it can simply be understood, to make a break from the politics and policies of the past.


When two historical documents – the “Protocol on the establishment of diplomatic relations” and the “Protocol on the development of bilateral relations” between Turkey and Armenia on October 10, 2009 were signed, the world community assessed the event as the biggest “change” in the South Caucasus since 1994.


After signing protocols, Turkey hoped that the road map and protocols would soften the Armenian position and spur a Karabakh negotiation, which remain obstacle to peace in South Caucasus region. Instead, the road map and protocols played counter-productive role and emboldened Armenia to take an even more unconstructive position in the Karabakh talks.



Armenians have argued that the Karabakh conflict should be a separate issue and Ankara should not use it as a precondition for Turkish-Armenian rapprochement. But in reality, completing this process largely depends, directly and indirectly, on soonest and successful results of the negotiations between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Frankly, Turkish-Armenian normalization process has stalled since last fall when the countries signed the protocols on normalization.


Today, the fact is that the nature of the world’s challenges is changing. But the old nationalism remains in Armenia – unfortunately. On Monday, Raffi Hovannisian, founder of the opposition Heritage Party and independent Armenia’s first foreign minister, has stated that “the democratic and competitive policy of modern Armenia must be built not only on the periodic visits of the diaspora but also on wonderful, colorful, romantic speeches”. He emphasized the dream of Armenian people to “change” in a way that it promotes old Armenian nationalism much more boldly.


On the other hand, clearly, Armenia is strongly within the Russian sphere of influence, both on economic and military fields. Though this seems to be adding more power to Armania, it could also be considered as a potential mark of Yerevan’s weakness. It is because the Kremlin is not focused on Armenia at the moment for Yerevan is so beholden to Moscow that Russia does not need to exert any effort to maintain its foothold in the country. The West has long tried to promote the reconciliation process between Turkey and Armenia by helping Ankara to play a stabilizing role in the Caucasus and reducing the Kremlin’s influence on Armenia.


Therefore, we must ask; has Armenia changed and/or is it really geared towards a European perspective? It is unfortunate that the answer must be negative. Thus, Armenia has not really grasped the concept of change, even though they have been parading it for quite some time now. When the Armenian Government refers to change, they must refer to a break from the highlighting the so called “genocide issue”; stand constructive position in negotiation process of the Karabakh conflict, fulfill their responsibility of country’s progress in democratization and in the installation of the rule of law.

About the author / 


Leave a reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


  • 25th Issue is Online Now!

    Vol. VI | No. IV – October-November-December 2020 To Download the Magazine Click Here… CONTENTS 05-13….. World News by Ebru Birinci 15-20….. The Jungle Grows Back How can We Redefine the Future World Order in the Tension of Power and Ideas? by Marco Marsili 22-29….. Interview With Professor Katharyne Mitchell by Ozgur Tufekci & Rahman…

  • 24th Issue is Online Now!

    Vol. VI | No. III – July-August-September 2020 To Download the Magazine Click Here… CONTENTS 05-14….. World News by Ebru Birinci 17-24….. Preparedness for an Uncertain Future “The Only Thing We Have to Fear is Fear Itself” by Professor Mark Meirowitz 25-39….. EU LAW vs UK LAW The Primacy of EU Law over National Law:…

  • IEPAS2020 is Going Virtual!

    Dear Friends and Colleagues, IEPAS2020 is Going Virtual! Due to the COVID19 pandemic, we are holding our entire conference virtually by streaming all of the live sessions. You may participate in all of our virtual networking events. In case of missing a session, you may get full access to the replays of every session since all…

  • The 13th issue of JCTS (Journal of Conflict Transformation & Security) is out now…

    The 13th issue of JCTS (Journal of Conflict Transformation & Security) is out now… Vol. 8 | No. 1 | 2020 Click here to Download the Entire Issue   TABLE OF CONTENTS Editor’s Note By David Curran Introduction By Nergis Canefe Research Articles Statelessness as a Permanent State: Challenges to the Human Security Paradigm By…

  • The 19th Issue of The Rest: Journal of Politics and Development is Out Now!

    The 19th issue of the rest: journal of politics and development is out now. Download the issue here… TABLE OF CONTENTS Research Articles Turkish AK Parti’s Posture towards the 2003 War in Iraq: The Impact of Religion amid Security Concerns By Alberto Gasparetto Nigeria and the Great Powers: The Impacts of the Boko Haram Terrorism on…

  • CESRAN International Named again amongst the Top Think Tanks in the World

    CESRAN International is pleased to announce that it has been named again amongst the world’s best think tanks. The 2019 Global Go To Think Tank Index ranked CESRAN International 141st among the World’s “Top Think Tanks in Western Europe” 75th among the World’s “Top Environment Policy Think Tanks” 153rd among the World’s “Top Foreign Policy…