CESRAN Blog, Rahman Dag, Turkey and Neighbourhood

CESRAN Reflections on Turkey’s June 7 Parliamentary Elections by Dr. Rahman Dağ

0 224

From 2002 onwards, the AK party won a majority in every Turkish election. Erdoğan always won comfortably, whether in national elections, local votes, or the more recent presidential one. However, the party lost its parliamentary majority and saw its share of the vote fall in the June 7 Parliamentary elections.


In my view, this election will be a turning point  in the history of Turkey in terms of proving that the people, regardless of their distinctive ethnic origins and ideologies, have become the major determinant of the political administration of the country. From this perspective, that will be one of the most significant benefits passed on by the AKP governments to the nation. To start analysing the election  in this way might seem to be contradictory to the results, as the AK party lost almost 10 percent of votes and a considerable amount of parliamentary seats. Yet, on the contrary,  it is actually a solid indication of the above argument. In these terms, all  the electors who voted in this election should be proud of the results.

I would argue that there are three fundamental reasons why the result came out as    they did:  the   peace process, the party’s lost connection with its electorate and the polarization of the people of Turkey  into pro-AKP and anti-AKP positions, or  more accurately into pro-Erdogan and anti-Erdogan positions.

Picture2

Image: Daily Sabah

With regard to  the first  point , efforts to keep the peace process stable until the election, and implying that unilateral  steps forward would follow after the election, caused resentments among both Turkish and Kurdish  voters whose political preferences went to the MHP (pro-Turkish nationalist, Nationalist Action Party) and to the HDP (pro-Kurdish, People’s Democracy Party), respectively.  As Davutoğlu suggested when he was chosen as president of the AK party, the cost of going backward from the peace process would be much more harmful  than going forward. This recognised the influence of stability in the peace process on voters, but failed to appreciate the necessity to move forward or to show progress. Because, the way the peace process   attracts  support from voters depends on concrete results. In this manner stability, when it needs development, created a vague atmosphere which  reduced  people’s trust in the AK Party’s intention to solve the Kurdish question.  Compared to this ambiguous position,  the substantial efforts of the HDP during the election campaign and the MHP’s critical stance against the peace process seemed more preferable to certain interested voters.

Picture3

The composition of the Turkish parliament in terms of seats since 2002. Image: Anadolu Agency

The next reason would be the determination process of MP candidates. Based on  Party regulations, all candidates should be chosen in accordance with preliminary elections  at provincial and district level. Seemingly, the first stage of this process has been carried out. But the results of these preliminary elections and the final MP candidate lists  were dramatically different, which caused disturbance among the Party’s own electoral base. Due to this practical reality, some of the candidates resigned and their supporters changed their preference from the AK Party to alternate political parties.  With my experience and knowledge it can be said that, in so doing, the AK Party sided with capital holders rather than candidates who have  a trusted connection with electorates. It is hard to   distinguish who is responsible for changing the names of candidates from those chosen by the electorate  to capital holders. Whoever or whatever administrative position  in the AK Party  was responsible, this is the main reason why the AK Party distanced itself from the people,   reducing the overall percentage of the vote obtained by the ruling party.

Picture4

The number of votes received by each party since 2002. Image: Anadolu Agency

Last but not least, the President of Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s harsh  criticism of opposition parties during  meetings brought to a peak  the gradually accumulated anti-Erdogan stance among supporters of the opposition parties. . If he  had been doing  this as the president of the AK party it would not have changed the almost 10 percent of voters who  switched to opposition parties. However,  acting as if he was AK party leader  whilst officially being the President of Turkey did not suit the political culture of  this country, in which a parliamentary system has been  in operation since the formation of the nation. This might be mostly related to the political system discussion but previously accumulated resentments among  opposition groups have obviously been channelled to the personality of the president.

Picture5

Total seats gained by each party since 2002. Image: Anadolu Agency

This short  analysis of the 2015 general election appears to be focusing on why the AK Party lost a considerable amount of electoral support rather than on how the opposition  parties increased their support.

On this problematic issue, I personally can say that most of the critics are centred on who is in power. In the case of a coalition government formed by opposition parties then the analysis would be centred on them.

It would be unethical to end any analysis of the 2015 general election without mentioning the remarkable electoral success of the HDP.  Thanks to their  highly- inclusive electoral  campaigning  the result was that the increased number of Kurdish and socialist democrats’ votes transcended the 10 percent threshold. Consequently, gaining eight seats in the parliament will provide an opportunity to make effective politics in the way they like. Approximately half of their electoral support (coming from ethnic Kurds)  will expect to see a serious contribution  to the peace process and the rest will expect to see an effective challenge to the AK party as opposition party in parliament. They have actually met the expectation of some  by preventing the AK party  from gaining enough seats to form a single party government.

As mentioned at the beginning, whatever comes out in this new picture of politics, in general it is tremendously important that the people of Turkey  feel that they are the major determinant of who is going to be the government so that  no external intervention will be successful  – only the PEOPLE of TURKEY.

About the author / 

CESRAN Int.

Leave a reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

CESRAN Blog

  • 24th Issue is Online Now!

    Vol. VI | No. III – July-August-September 2020 To Download the Magazine Click Here… CONTENTS 05-14….. World News by Ebru Birinci 17-24….. Preparedness for an Uncertain Future “The Only Thing We Have to Fear is Fear Itself” by Professor Mark Meirowitz 25-39….. EU LAW vs UK LAW The Primacy of EU Law over National Law:…

  • IEPAS2020 is Going Virtual!

    Dear Friends and Colleagues, IEPAS2020 is Going Virtual! Due to the COVID19 pandemic, we are holding our entire conference virtually by streaming all of the live sessions. You may participate in all of our virtual networking events. In case of missing a session, you may get full access to the replays of every session since all…

  • The 13th issue of JCTS (Journal of Conflict Transformation & Security) is out now…

    The 13th issue of JCTS (Journal of Conflict Transformation & Security) is out now… Vol. 8 | No. 1 | 2020 Click here to Download the Entire Issue   TABLE OF CONTENTS Editor’s Note By David Curran Introduction By Nergis Canefe Research Articles Statelessness as a Permanent State: Challenges to the Human Security Paradigm By…

  • The 19th Issue of The Rest: Journal of Politics and Development is Out Now!

    The 19th issue of the rest: journal of politics and development is out now. Download the issue here… TABLE OF CONTENTS Research Articles Turkish AK Parti’s Posture towards the 2003 War in Iraq: The Impact of Religion amid Security Concerns By Alberto Gasparetto Nigeria and the Great Powers: The Impacts of the Boko Haram Terrorism on…

  • CESRAN International Named again amongst the Top Think Tanks in the World

    CESRAN International is pleased to announce that it has been named again amongst the world’s best think tanks. The 2019 Global Go To Think Tank Index ranked CESRAN International 141st among the World’s “Top Think Tanks in Western Europe” 75th among the World’s “Top Environment Policy Think Tanks” 153rd among the World’s “Top Foreign Policy…

  • THE 18TH ISSUE OF THE REST: JOURNAL OF POLITICS AND DEVELOPMENT IS OUT NOW.

    The 18th issue of the rest: journal of politics and development is out now. Download the issue here… TABLE OF CONTENTS Research Articles The Foreign Policy Decision Making Approaches and Their Applications Case Study: Bush, Obama and Trump’s Decision Making towards Afghanistan and the Region By Sharifullah Dorani Evaluating the Explanatory Power of Social Identity Theory,…

Newsletter